Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Wellbeing, Space and Society ; 4, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-20237698

ABSTRACT

End-of-life care, bereavement and grief involve significant challenges and impact our wellbeing in varied ways. For transnational migrants, geographical distance to a dying loved one, relatives, friends and meaningful locations can further complicate care, bereavement and grief. Our research aims to improve understandings of the role distance plays for transnational migrant wellbeing at these times. Using an instrumental, interpretative case study design we explored the experiences of five people with migration backgrounds with end-of-life care, bereavement and grief in Tasmania, Australia. Additional data sources included policies for end-of-life and bereavement care in Tasmania. In our study, participants tended to seek – and create – places and spaces of informal, rather than formal, support, both in their receiving society and country of origin. Online spaces played a key role: keeping people in touch with family members overseas, providing a means to care from a distance and ways to participate in grief rituals – albeit with mixed success. A lack of places to perform death and grief rituals, and inability to be physically present at a loved one's death (for some, due to COVID-19 travel restrictions) posed significant challenges to participants' wellbeing and impacted coping. We argue that if societies better understand the significances of places, spaces and distance during times of end-of-life, bereavement and grief, we can adjust policy and practice accordingly to collectively optimise wellbeing for transnational migrants. © 2023

2.
Historical Social Research ; 2021:193-226, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1593686

ABSTRACT

»Die Influenza-Pandemie 1918/19 und COVID-19 in Irland und dem Vereinigten Königreich«. The global spread of the coronavirus pandemic has prompted inevitable comparisons with the flu pandemic of 1918–1920. However, in order for such comparisons to be fruitful, it is necessary to acknowledge the similarities between the two outbreaks and their differences. This paper compares different aspects of the “Spanish” flu and coronavirus pandemics in Ireland and the UK during the two periods. The first part of the paper provides a general overview, taking account of the nature of the two diseases and the contexts in which they occurred. The following two sections explore the extent to which both outbreaks exposed underlying social and economic inequalities and the measures taken by central and local government, as well as civil society, to combat the spread of disease. The final section examines the extent to which both pandemics highlighted existing failures and sparked demands to “build back better.”. © 2021, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. All rights reserved.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL